Can Conference Proceedings Be Purblished Again on a Journal
This postal service discusses whether it is is appropriate to publish a conference paper as a journal article or book chapter.
The mail service was prompted past a discussion I had with 1 of my brightest students, which might resonate with your experience. She had recently presented at a conference, and —having received positive feedback— was considering submitting her paper to a journal. She felt, rightly, that this would exist beneficial to her career, because journal articles tend to exist more highly-regarded than briefing contributions, and considering she felt that having more publications in her CV would add to her credibility as a fledgling scholar. However, she was conscious that using the aforementioned research twice felt similar gaming the system, and she wanted to know if it is really OK to submit.
The curt reply to this question is 'aye'. In language education, and in many other disciplines, it is quite common for journal manufactures to begin their life as conference presentations (and if you roll all the fashion to the lesser of this postal service, you can find out more about how to expand a conference newspaper to a journal article).Just before y'all practise whatsoever of that, there are three things that you should consider.
Does the new newspaper infringe copyright?
Many bookish conferences present have their proceedings published, even if the 'proceedings' only exist every bit a .pdf file that lives briefly online at the conference website. When this happens, copyright of the papers that are included in the proceedings unremarkably passes from the author(due south) to the conference organisers. Sometimes, transfer of copyright is formally acknowledged in a signed certificate, but fifty-fifty if that is non the case, copyright is tacitly transferred when you agree to have a newspaper published (in some cases, local police may allow the author to reserve some rights, but let's non become into whatsoever of that).
Reproducing textile that has already been published (again, this includes electronic and non-commercial publications) would exist a violation of the publishers' copyright, and could —at to the lowest degree in theory— accept legal consequences. In practise, briefing organisers are normally happy to grant yous permission to re-use your content, in exchange for an acknowledgement by the author that the paper was showtime presented at their briefing. However, permission must be requested, rather than assumed, and organisers are well within their rights to refuse. Another thing to consider is that briefing organisers are often hard to reach after the end of the conference, and responding to your queries might not be an immediate priority for them. In such cases, too, the text cannot be re-used verbatim.
It is possible to rephrase the content of a briefing presentation in a way that would avoid copyright infringement. Different disciplines and different countries have different rules about this. Some of the rules-of-thumb I have come up beyond while researching this mail service range from having less than x% textual overlap to having at least xxx% new content. But actually, what you should exist doing is exercising common sense in interpreting whatsoever guideline applies. For example, overlap acquired by shared quotations or information extracts is less of a problem; multiple identical paragraphs, on the other hand, might be problematic, fifty-fifty if they business relationship for less than ten% of the total text. Schematics and tables cannot be paraphrased, and may therefore testify somewhat challenging, but re-using them judiciously and with appropriate commendation might exist considered 'fair use' depending on local law.
Does the new newspaper deceive readers?
(Photograph by Amtec Photos | CC BY-SA)
The 2nd result to consider is academic honesty. The main problem hither is self-plagiarism, i.e., re-publishing a text y'all wrote in the past, and passing it off as something new. Unlike actual plagiarism, self-plagiarism does not involve 'stealing' words or ideas, just it is still an human activity of academic deception. Readers, who may spend money and time to access an author's work, exercise and then because they implicitly expect that they have never read this work before, and self-plagiarism violates their trust (How would you lot feel if you lot bought a detective novel, only to detect that it had the same plot every bit the author's previous piece of work, forth with identical chunks of text?).
Another reason why so-called 'duplicate' publications are problematic is that they can distort the scholarly record. This is because they get in unclear that two or more papers (i.due east., the conference presentation and the subsequent paper) refer to the aforementioned study. Readers might be left with the impression that the findings of the journal commodity ostend those reported in the briefing, when in fact it is the same dataset that is beingness described twice. In some disciplines, most notably medicine, such distortion could have serious consequences if, for case, the same dataset were to be included several times in a meta-analysis that draws on multiple manufactures. In language education, and probably most of the Humanities and Social Sciences likewise, implications are usually not quite so dire. Even so, distorting the scholarly record is taken seriously, and information technology leads to article retractions, which are very public and very embarrassing for everyone involved.
To bargain with these risks, what you need to do is to be very articulate that the article stems from a previous conference contribution, and do this consistently in all the stages of the publication process. A common way to evidence the origin of the article is by inserting a footnote or endnote somewhere in the text (e.g.,"The findings reported in this commodity were originally presented at…."). It is too good practice to draw the journal editor'south attending to the previous publication, and explain what —if any— changes take been fabricated. This allows them to make their own decision about whether the paper merits farther consideration, plus they can often offering helpful suggestions most how to bargain with the situation.
Does the new paper add together value to the scholarly record?
Expanded, more fully developed, or more refined versions of a conference paper add value to the scholarly record.
(Photo by Mikes Photos on Pexels.com)
A final thing to consider when thinking near publishing a presentation equally a periodical article is whether the new publication adds to the body of scholarly knowledge. Sometimes (but not very ofttimes), information technology may actually exist useful to re-publish a conference paper as a journal commodity with no changes at all. This may be the case with obscure or regional conferences, or conferences that only publish their proceedings in a limited number of print volumes. In such a instance, an argument could be made that the new publication helps to make the findings available to a wider readership, although institutional and disciplinary repositories are usually a better culling (Here's a list of such repositories, in case you're interested).
A far more compelling argument in favour of a new publication tin can be made when the journal article is an expanded, more fully developed, or more refined version of the conference paper. At minimum, the text will take to exist adapted to meet the needs of the journal'due south readership, and any changes that highlight dissimilar aspects of the study may be of scholarly value. Another matter to remember is that conference papers tend to be shorter and more focused than journal articles. For instance, when presenting at a conference, we sometimes avoid lengthy literature reviews, bold that the audience will be familiar with the state-of-the-art. Too, the time limit of a briefing presentation means that we we often take to be selective most how much data we can nowadays. A journal article could address these shortcomings past presenting a fuller argument in proper context. Finally, information technology is quite common for our thinking to develop in response to the discussion that the conference paper generated. Journal articles that grow out of briefing presentations (rather than merely echo the aforementioned content) are a welcome add-on to the literature.
In summary…
Coming dorsum to the original question: Provided the new submission passes the tests of legality , ethics and value , information technology is perfectly fine to publish a conference presentation every bit an commodity.
Before you go: If you landed on this page considering you're planning to write an commodity, I promise that yous establish this post helpful and I wish you all the best with your publishing endeavours.
For some ideas about preparing a briefing paper for publication, y'all may want to accept a look at this editorial, by Jeff Offutt, the editor of the Journal of Software Testing, Verification and Reliability.
If yous have more questions, feel free to drop a line in the comments beneath, or inquire me using this contact form. At that place's too a range of social sharing buttons below, in case yous experience similar sharing this information with anyone else who might find it useful.
Source: https://achilleaskostoulas.com/2014/01/11/can-i-publish-a-conference-paper-in-a-journal/
0 Response to "Can Conference Proceedings Be Purblished Again on a Journal"
Post a Comment